Sorry if this question seems tangential. As you may know, theorizing scale is very important right now among arboreal herbivorous marsupials, possibly due to the psychic trauma caused by Pluto’s recent loss of status as a planet. If clearing your orbital zone and assuming a central gravitational role is key to qualifying as a planet, then couldn’t small stature, a diet high in tannins, and a global surplus of eucalypts cause some analogous failure to koalafy? Indeed, your inclusion of folding tesseract stairways to nowhere recalls for me the well-known Wombat Hypercube theory, by which any regular octachoron can be converted into a hypersphere of equivalent spin in seventy-three easy steps. So, my question is this: given the importance of tessellated polytopes among burrowing herbivorous marsupials, how can you justify your assertion that gas planets are the measure of small things?
