This is more of a comment than a question. We are all familiar with deduction, induction, and abduction, but transduction is new to me. I’m particularly interested in your concept of yoda, vital to a vibrant stasis philosophy which can critique the established ideology of process, evolution, and so-called “change” in general. The yoda, as you suggest, is a set of antennae attuned to the transduction not of body and mind – as, say, the Hindu jiva is – but instead of mind and mind. Given the correct polarization and the proper alignment of both ergosphere and ludisphere, this yoda the key to parallel consciousness might be. But, while they are mathemagical, physiognomic, and incredibly satisfying to me as a practicing stasis philosopher, your equations lack a concept for the transduction of body and body, a concept we might be tempted to call jabba. Care to comment on that?
